-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13923/
-----------------------------------------------------------

(Updated Sept. 4, 2013, 11:49 p.m.)


Review request for shindig.


Changes
-------

Added a unit test that reproduces the issue.  I decided to add Powermock as a 
test-scoped dependency to help get at the CacheManager.  I figure we can make 
use of it in other unit tests moving forward as well.


Bugs: SHINDIG-1931
    https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SHINDIG-1931


Repository: shindig


Description
-------

Reported on the dev list[1].  The issue is that the 
CacheManager.create(Configuration) APIs will always use the same singleton, 
regardless of whether the provided Configuration defines a cache manager of a 
different name then the existing singleton.  We should use the 
CacheManager.newInstance(Configuration) APIs, as this will use a singleton per 
cache manager name.  This will keep us from stomping on other cache managers 
that exist in the environment.

[1] 
http://markmail.org/message/4adopzvvi3ltv7yq?q=Shindig+list:org.apache.shindig.dev+order:date-backward&page=1


Diffs (updated)
-----

  
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/shindig/trunk/java/common/src/main/java/org/apache/shindig/common/cache/ehcache/EhCacheCacheProvider.java
 1519267 
  
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/shindig/trunk/java/common/src/test/java/org/apache/shindig/common/cache/ehcache/EhCacheCacheProviderTest.java
 1519267 
  
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/shindig/trunk/java/common/src/test/resources/testEhCacheConfig.xml
 PRE-CREATION 
  http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/shindig/trunk/pom.xml 1519267 

Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13923/diff/


Testing
-------

Unit tests continue to pass.  Shindig starts and samples load in the sample 
container.


Thanks,

Stanton Sievers

Reply via email to