Hey Joe, On 12/15/12 4:18 AM, "Joe White" <[email protected]> wrote:
>I"m not sure how that's going to work, as I'm actually doing the work >inside the TIKA codeŠ Am I looking at this wrong? No you are looking at it right :) However, inside of the Tika code, you can now issue a dependency on the new sis-referencing module and pull in that functionality as it's happening -- so you're really wearing 2 hats, here. :) Cheers, Chris > >Joe >On Dec 15, 2012, at 12:14 AM, "Mattmann, Chris A (388J)" ><[email protected]> wrote: > >> +1, sounds great Martin! >> >> Could you point Joe and I at the GeoTK stuff that you're porting? >>Anything >> I could help port? >> >> Cheers, >> Chris >> >> On 12/14/12 7:21 PM, "Martin Desruisseaux" >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Le 15/12/12 03:46, Joe White a écrit : >>>> This led directly to this thread wrt needing some geometry library / >>>> classes to encompass the envelopes. If you have other ideas, please >>>>let >>>> me know. >>> >>> On the Tika side, I don't know... But on the SIS side, I could port at >>> least the foundation of GeneralEnvelope from Geotk this week. It would >>> be put in "sis-referencing" module (I admit that this sound strange >>> since we would rather expect them in some "sis-geometry" module, but >>> Envelope and DirectPosition are two exceptions since they are used by >>> referencing code). >>> >>> Martin >>> >> >
