+1 from me.
On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 5:20 AM, Adam Estrada <[email protected]> wrote: > Hmm...It does make sense to do it that way. I look at the way GDAL > references its drivers and writing out the entire name gets to be messy, > IMO. "ESRI Shapefile" with the space in it is not cool. > > So, if in Maven you need to reference each module with the preceding sis-* > I think that would definitely be a lot cleaner. > > Adam > > On May 5, 2013, at 7:41 PM, Greg Reddin wrote: > > > Something like that is what I'd suggest too. > > > > Sent from my mobile device. > > > > On May 5, 2013, at 4:31 PM, "Mattmann, Chris A (398J)" < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > >> +1, sounds good Martin. > >> > >> Let's have: > >> > >> sis-storage > >> sis-kml > >> sis-netcdf > >> > >> sis-shapefile > >> > >> Then. Sounds like we agree on package naming, so +1! > >> > >> Cheers, > >> Chris > >> > >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > >> Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. > >> Senior Computer Scientist > >> NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA > >> Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246 > >> Email: [email protected] > >> WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ > >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > >> Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department > >> University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA > >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Martin Desruisseaux <[email protected]> > >> Organization: Geomatys > >> Reply-To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > >> Date: Sunday, May 5, 2013 2:16 PM > >> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > >> Subject: Re: Proposal to create sis-netcdf module Sunday > >> > >>> Hello Chris > >>> > >>> Le 05/05/13 23:05, Mattmann, Chris A (398J) a écrit : > >>>> What about a single module: > >>>> > >>>> sis-storage > >>>> > >>>> That has underneath it: > >>>> netcdf > >>>> shapefile > >>>> kxml > >>>> > >>>> Sub modules? That should reduce the top level bloat. > >>> > >>> Maybe with a slight modification? > >>> > >>> storage > >>> > >>> as the parent module, then > >>> > >>> sis-netcdf > >>> sis-shapefile > >>> sis-kml > >>> > >>> as sub-modules. The reason is that "leaf" sub-modules are also JAR file > >>> names, at least in default Maven configuration. > >>> > >>>> In addition, +1 to keeping all o.a.sis.storage.netcdf.* > >>>> together (and similarly for o.a.sis.storage.kml, and > >>>> o.a.sis.storage.shapefile) > >>> > >>> Cool, org.apache.sis.storage.netcdf sound fine. > >>> > >>> Martin > >> > > -- Charitha Madusanka Linkdin : http://www.linkedin.com/pub/charith-madusanka/1a/508/42a Twitter : http://twitter.com/#!/charithccmc
