Hello Johann
Le 06/05/13 09:12, johann sorel a écrit :
Do we keep both coverage and feature stores in the same group ?
I was thinking to merge "coverage stores" and "feature stores" in the
same group, for the reason that you mentioned (according ISO, coverage
is a special kind of feature), and also because some storage like NetCDF
and PostGIS provides both coverages and features.
What about web services clients ?
I'm fine about putting them in a separated group.
Just with the Geotoolkit formats, that would make about 30 modules.
Well, one think I would like to do with SIS is to reduce the amount of
modules. It make senses to have a whole module for a very complicated
format, or for a format that introduce big dependencies. But if we have
many formats that are very small, it may make senses to provide some of
them in a common module. For example "GeoTIFF", "World File" and "ASCII
grid" sound small and basic enough for being in a common module.
What about this :
sis-storage
- sis-shapefile
- sis-geotiff
- sis-postgis
- ...
sis-client
- sis-wms
- sis-wfs
- sis-csw
- ...
Sound fine to me.
Martin
