Yep roll it back l was trying to commit Suresh's latest patch but got messed up I guess..
Sent from my iPhone On May 8, 2013, at 10:30 AM, "Andrew Hart" <[email protected]> wrote: > Hey Martin, that's helpful information. > > I turned to svnsearch.org to see if I could track down the revision in which > the contents became empty. From what I can tell, r1470108 is the revision in > which all of the content was removed: > > http://svnsearch.org/svnsearch/repos/ASF/search?p=/sis/site/trunk/content/&rev=1470108&path%2Fsis%2Fsite%2Ftrunk%2Fcontent > > Not sure what exactly happened with that commit, but that's definitely where > all the content got removed. The cleanest approach might be to just roll back > to that, then to repeat the move... > > What do you guys think? > > -Andrew. > > On 5/8/13 11:44 AM, Martin Desruisseaux wrote: >> Le 08/05/13 20:24, Andrew Hart a écrit : >>> all appear to be completely empty. It is possible that something went awry >>> during Martin's move, or at some other point, but at least Subversion and >>> the CMS are in agreement that there is no content to display in the latest >>> revision. >>> >>> We might want to just roll things back and try the move again. >> >> Actually I already noticed before the move than many files were empty. I >> just tried "svn update -r1470108" (the revision before the move) and the >> files are still empty. >> >> The content of the following directories: >> >> content/css/ >> content/js/ >> >> appears to be duplicated there: >> >> content/assets/libs/bootstrap/css/ >> content/assets/libs/bootstrap/js/ >> >> also with empty files, except the jquery-1.9.1.min.js file which exists only >> in "content/js/". I saw also a "assets/libs/bootstrap.zip" file with again >> the same files, but now now-empty. Consequently: >> >> 1) Can I assume that a problem occurred when the files were unzipped, and >> unzip again bootstrap.zip? This would overwrite the empty files in >> "content/assets/libs/bootstrap"? >> >> 2) Is the content of "content/assets/libs/bootstrap" actually supposed to be >> in "content/"? If so, should I move them? >> >> Martin >
