Hi Martin, On Jul 1, 2013, at 9:47 AM, Martin Desruisseaux <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hello Suresh > > Le 30/06/13 02:18, Suresh Marru a écrit : >> I think rat check have to be part of release steps which saves significant >> time in verifying the license header. > Does the Maven generated RAT report provides the required information? > > https://builds.apache.org/job/sis-trunk/site/rat-report.html Yes this is exactly what I was referring. Great!. I will see if I can add the headers it is complaining today. > >> Also, I suggest to use different assembly for source and binaries so license >> and notice files can be captured separately and bundled accordingly. > I agree for 2 separated download files, one for source and one for binary. Is > that the proposal? Yes, I would propose to use the separate assembly, I am trying not to step onto you and Chris, but if needed, I can help out with these. Suresh > > Martin >
