Hey Martin, I like the idea of using a convention like "sis-profile-france" like you mentioned. In my mind, it makes it less ambiguous and a little bit easier to understand for someone brand new to the project.
Adam On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 9:13 AM, Martin Desruisseaux < [email protected]> wrote: > Hello all > > We currently have 3 group of modules: > > * core (includes sis-metadata, sis-referencing, sis-feature) > * storage (includes sis-storage, sis-netcdf) > * application (includes sis-webapp, sis-console) > > I would like to create a new group: > > * profile > > This group is about countries or organizations which define custom > extensions to the international standards. This group would initially > contains only "sis-france" (or maybe "sis-profile-france") with some > extensions mandated by the French government, but extensions for other > countries or organizations could be added in the future. > > Does it sound okay? Or is there other naming or layout proposals? > > Martin > >
