+1 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. Senior Computer Scientist NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246 Email: [email protected] WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
-----Original Message----- From: Adam Estrada <[email protected]> Reply-To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Date: Tuesday, August 20, 2013 7:06 AM To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Subject: Re: Would like to create a "profile" group of modules >Hey Martin, > >I like the idea of using a convention like "sis-profile-france" like you >mentioned. In my mind, it makes it less ambiguous and a little bit easier >to understand for someone brand new to the project. > >Adam > > >On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 9:13 AM, Martin Desruisseaux < >[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hello all >> >> We currently have 3 group of modules: >> >> * core (includes sis-metadata, sis-referencing, sis-feature) >> * storage (includes sis-storage, sis-netcdf) >> * application (includes sis-webapp, sis-console) >> >> I would like to create a new group: >> >> * profile >> >> This group is about countries or organizations which define custom >> extensions to the international standards. This group would initially >> contains only "sis-france" (or maybe "sis-profile-france") with some >> extensions mandated by the French government, but extensions for other >> countries or organizations could be added in the future. >> >> Does it sound okay? Or is there other naming or layout proposals? >> >> Martin >> >>
