Hi Martin, I think that should be fine. It would be good those in trunk by the conference though. I will investigate Tika Metadata class and your changes you suggested for the new Feature class.
Thanks, Travis On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 5:35 AM, Martin Desruisseaux <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello all > > I have been trapped in "Parameter" work because of the similarity in > implementation details between Parameters and Features, even if the > concepts are different. Now I have only 2 weeks left before the deadline > for submitting ApacheCon slides. I did not yet started the slides, and I > think that we need a SIS 0.4 release before the conference... I'm going > to miss time. Consequently would peoples agree to omit Feature - and > consequently Shapefile since it needs Feature - for the SIS 0.4 release? > The class would be untouched on trunk, we would just omit them on the > 0.4 tag. We would continue the Feature / Shapefile work after ApacheCon > for making sure that they are included in SIS 0.5, and would try (again) > to release 0.5 faster than we did for 0.4. > > What do peoples think? > > Martin >
