Hello Thorbjoern,

I am in favor of "code prettifiers" as long as they allow us to emphasize, e.g. present in bold, selected parts of the code, but if not, then I prefer ugly. :-)

Thorbjoern Ravn Andersen wrote:
Ceki Gulcu skrev:
Hello Thorbjørn,

Do you intend to pursue this effort on coloring? As this revision stands, I don't see the point... Put differently, it looks like a lot of effort for a meager result. WDYT?

Been busy with other things the last few days.

Meager? Don't think so! And it was trivially simple to do with vim, so if it would make it more readable it is a benefit to the documentation.

I was inspired by the way StackOverflow presents its code snippets, and it turns out they use Prettify:

http://code.google.com/p/google-code-prettify/

which uses Javascript. Perhaps that would both be easier, simpler to maintain and ... well... prettier :)


--
Ceki Gülcü
Logback: The reliable, generic, fast and flexible logging framework for Java.
http://logback.qos.ch
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
dev@slf4j.org
http://www.slf4j.org/mailman/listinfo/dev

Reply via email to