Hi, Olivier:

Sorry about the delay of the response. For some reason, I didn't receive your 
original email in my mailbox.

'application.def' is not required for launching Docker based application 
through Slider. I just re-verified with the tip of develop branch of Slider and 
it seems to work fine.

Can you please checkout the latest revision of develop branch if you don't have 
to stick to your current revision of Slider?



http://slider.incubator.apache.org/docs/slider_specs/application_pkg_docker.html
is the documentation for how to deploy Docker applications with Slider

Please let me know if your problem remains.

Thank you

Thomas


________________________________________
From: Gour Saha <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2015 3:33 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Docker-based app: defining application.def

Fwd-ing to the DL again, as it seems our docker dev was not receiving
these emails.

-Gour

On 6/8/15, 4:43 AM, "Olivier Armand" <[email protected]> wrote:

>Hi,
>
>Rephrasing the initial question: should users consider Slider's Docker
>support usable starting from 0.80, as there doesn't seem to be any public
>sample nor up-to-date documentation?
>
>-- Olivier
>
>On Sun, May 24, 2015 at 9:59 PM, Olivier Armand <[email protected]>
>wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm trying to deploy a simple docker-based application, following these
>> instructions:
>>
>>http://slider.incubator.apache.org/docs/slider_specs/application_pkg_dock
>>er.html
>>
>> The "slider create" exits with the following error:
>> ERROR main.ServiceLauncher - Application definition must be provided.
>> Missing option application.def from set global
>>
>> I indeed didn't specify any application.def. How should this attribute
>>be
>> set for a docker-based application?
>> Is there any up-to-date and working sample docker-based application?
>>
>> (Note: I also noticed that the application appears in "slider list"
>>output
>> and needs to be destroyed before recreating it, although I would expect
>>the
>> deployment to either entirely fail or succeed).
>>
>> -- Olivier
>>

Reply via email to