On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 11:14 PM, Felix Meschberger <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > No, we don't. We also treat them differently: In Felix it is a single > properties file containing all jre-xxx properties, while we have > separate files per version. Also Felix attaches a version (the version > of the JRE) to the exports, which I think is not 100% accurate....
Well, maybe this is stuff we can address at felix. The version is still an interesting problem. What do you think is a "100% accurate"? regards, Karl > Regards > Felix > > On 12.02.2010 23:00, Karl Pauls wrote: >> Don't we just get them from felix directly? If not, wouldn't it be >> better to get them from there (no need to have two sources of problems >> :-)? >> >> regards, >> >> Karl >> >> On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 10:52 PM, Felix Meschberger <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> But we maintain our own jre-1.6.properties, so we might want to add >>> these, too, right ? >>> >>> Regards >>> Felix >>> >>> On 12.02.2010 13:07, Carsten Ziegeler wrote: >>>> Juan José Vázquez Delgado wrote: >>>>> Hi!, >>>>> >>>>> Is there any reason why we aren't providing javax.xml.ws.wsaddressing >>>>> as a system package in jre-1.6.properties [1]?. I have an issue >>>>> regarding this. >>>>> >>>> I've no clue but two comments :) >>>> - this package is also missing in the default jre properties of the >>>> Felix framework (so maybe we're missing them because we copied from there?) >>>> - I thought we don't need these props at all anymore as Felix framework >>>> already contains them. >>>> >>>> Carsten >>>> >>> >>> >> >> >> > > -- Karl Pauls [email protected]
