Hi, On 12.02.2010 23:26, Karl Pauls wrote: > On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 11:21 PM, Felix Meschberger <[email protected]> > wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On 12.02.2010 23:18, Karl Pauls wrote: >>> On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 11:14 PM, Felix Meschberger <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> No, we don't. We also treat them differently: In Felix it is a single >>>> properties file containing all jre-xxx properties, while we have >>>> separate files per version. Also Felix attaches a version (the version >>>> of the JRE) to the exports, which I think is not 100% accurate.... >>> >>> Well, maybe this is stuff we can address at felix. >> >>> The version is >>> still an interesting problem. What do you think is a "100% accurate"? >> >> The list includes a number of API which has its own versioning live >> which is not the same as the JRE version. Now exporting all with the JRE >> version might create problems. > > Ah ok. You are talking about none jre packages right? Well, obviously, > they should be exported with their own versions but don't you use the > system.packages.extra prop for those?
No, we don't use that property. And I just used these packages, because off hand, I knew best about them. But what about javax.management.* ? This is included in JRE 1.6 but the official API version is 1.4 (JSR-3 MR5) (and JMX 2 is planned for Java 7 (well, yes, hmm, ...)). Or the various org.xml, org.w3c etc. APIs. Regards Felix > > regards, > > Karl > >> While, not contained in the list, the javax.jcr.* packages which exist >> as 1.0 and 2.0 and the javax.servlet.* packages existing as 2.x come to >> mind. >> >> Regards >> Felix >> >>> >>> regards, >>> >>> Karl >>> >>>> Regards >>>> Felix >>>> >>>> On 12.02.2010 23:00, Karl Pauls wrote: >>>>> Don't we just get them from felix directly? If not, wouldn't it be >>>>> better to get them from there (no need to have two sources of problems >>>>> :-)? >>>>> >>>>> regards, >>>>> >>>>> Karl >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 10:52 PM, Felix Meschberger <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>> >>>>>> But we maintain our own jre-1.6.properties, so we might want to add >>>>>> these, too, right ? >>>>>> >>>>>> Regards >>>>>> Felix >>>>>> >>>>>> On 12.02.2010 13:07, Carsten Ziegeler wrote: >>>>>>> Juan José Vázquez Delgado wrote: >>>>>>>> Hi!, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Is there any reason why we aren't providing javax.xml.ws.wsaddressing >>>>>>>> as a system package in jre-1.6.properties [1]?. I have an issue >>>>>>>> regarding this. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> I've no clue but two comments :) >>>>>>> - this package is also missing in the default jre properties of the >>>>>>> Felix framework (so maybe we're missing them because we copied from >>>>>>> there?) >>>>>>> - I thought we don't need these props at all anymore as Felix framework >>>>>>> already contains them. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Carsten >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> > > >
