Carsten Ziegeler  wrote
> Hi,
> 
> in order to finish our recent discussions about the
> JcrResourceTypeProvider and alternatives, I call for a vote to remove
> the current JcrResourceTypeProvider interface completly.
> 
> As discussed we'll add a new functionality, the ResourceDecorator, which
> has a more general approach and covers more use cases.
> 
> If we agree to remove the JcrResourceTypeProvider this would break
> potential implementations - however, there shouldn't be that many and
> converting those implementations to the ResourceDecorator interface
> should be easy.
> 
> So please cast your votes.
> 
+1

Carsten

-- 
Carsten Ziegeler
[email protected]

Reply via email to