+1 Justin
On 3/8/10 9:12 AM, Carsten Ziegeler wrote: > Hi, > > in order to finish our recent discussions about the > JcrResourceTypeProvider and alternatives, I call for a vote to remove > the current JcrResourceTypeProvider interface completly. > > As discussed we'll add a new functionality, the ResourceDecorator, which > has a more general approach and covers more use cases. > > If we agree to remove the JcrResourceTypeProvider this would break > potential implementations - however, there shouldn't be that many and > converting those implementations to the ResourceDecorator interface > should be easy. > > So please cast your votes. > > Regards > Carsten
