Bertrand Delacretaz wrote > On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 2:28 PM, Alexander Klimetschek <[email protected]> > wrote: >> ...the interface is called "BackgroundRequestProcessor". Maybe >> there is a misunderstanding of the semantics of the interface. If it >> would be only the sling main servlet exposed as service, I'd call it >> simply "SlingServlet".... Ups, yepp, you're right with the interface name :)
> > Makes sense, I'll do that, and call the method "service" - in the end > this is just a servlet. > I would not call it service - this avoids potential classes with the implementation as the implementation implements the servlet interface. Carsten -- Carsten Ziegeler [email protected]
