On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 7:41 AM, Carsten Ziegeler <[email protected]> wrote: > Bertrand Delacretaz wrote >> ...I'll do that, and call the method "service" - in the end >> this is just a servlet. >> > I would not call it service - this avoids potential classes with the > implementation as the implementation implements the servlet interface....
Agreed - I was already bitten by that in the meantime ;-) -Bertrand
