On Fri, 2022-03-04 at 15:25 +0100, Konrad Windszus wrote:
> But please wait for
> https://github.com/apache/sling-org-apache-sling-starter/pull/56 <
> https://github.com/apache/sling-org-apache-sling-starter/pull/56>
> being approved and merged, as not exporting OSGi R8 packages is not
> nice.
> Also I would like to squeeze
> https://github.com/apache/sling-org-apache-sling-starter/pull/55 <
> https://github.com/apache/sling-org-apache-sling-starter/pull/55>
> into Sling 12 and mention both OSGi Core R8 compliance and DS 1.4
> compliance in the release notes at
> https://github.com/apache/sling-site/blob/master/src/main/jbake/content/news/sling-12-released.md
>  <
> https://github.com/apache/sling-site/blob/master/src/main/jbake/content/news/sling-12-released.md
> >.

That works for me, thanks.

I would also like to discuss the Composum situation (
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-11168 ). The situation is
the following:

On Windows, for certain users ( Stefan, also reported by Sergiu )
composum does not install properly. We have a fix which involves
switching to content packages instead of bundles with initial content,
but makes the startup much longer - probably from 10 seconds to 25.

The problem does not appear with the Docker images.

I see three posssible approaches:

1. Switch to content packages and accept the considerably slower
startup
2. Diagnose the content loading problem and provide a fix in the
content loader
3. Postpone the problem since it does not affect the recommended way of
running the Starter *for our users*, which is Docker.

I would incline to skip the fix for the Starter 12 release (3) and then
find a solution for content loader (2). A second option would be
switching to content pacakges (1) and the a fix for the content loader
(2), but I think the quick startup time is something we should hold on
to.

Thoughts?
Thanks,
Robert

Reply via email to