Fair enough, apologies for not expressing myself here clearly. I
*suggested* something, this was neither a decision nor meant as a
dismission of something. However, I've seen too many cases where all
potential cases are considered first, leading then to a too complicated
solution that in the end is no one using - and that confuses users.
Regards
Carsten
Am 20.12.2022 um 20:31 schrieb Eric Norman:
My reply was not intended as a personal accusation. I apologize if you
took it that way.
I was simply expecting a reasoned discussion based on facts rather than a
dismissive reply that declared how it will be.
Regards,
Eric
On Tue, Dec 20, 2022, 3:53 AM Konrad Windszus <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi Eric,
Actually your concern/use case lead to a modified proposal (ensure nodes)
to allow for future other instructions (like update nodes).
But I agree with Carsten here (and I am not Adobe): personal accusations
don’t belong here and your are offending others with comments like these.
Konrad
On 19. Dec 2022, at 20:02, Eric Norman <[email protected]> wrote:
It seems my opinions don't matter
here as the Adobe voices have overwhelmed the discussion.
--
Carsten Ziegeler
Adobe
[email protected]
