Hi, Am 27.11.2012 um 11:11 schrieb Bertrand Delacretaz:
> On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 10:47 AM, Felix Meschberger <[email protected]> > wrote: >> ...Therefore, I would really prefer to continue leveraging configuration >> admin (and a small handfull of framework properties for basic setup)... > > Me too - I wasn't explicit on that but in my previous message but I > strongly support staying with ConfigAdmin. > > Instead of making big changes to our config mechanisms, we might > contribute a more programmatic way of configuring logback, if that > doesn't exist yet? Good point. How about being bold ? How about building Configuration Admin support directly into logback's configuration system such that we can use logback directly (and just have to care to bridge our old configurations to the new logback configurations) ? We could fork logback into the Sling Whiteboard (or github for that matter) for prototyping and contribute the changes back to logback. WDYT ? Regards Felix
