On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 11:31 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 11:20 AM, Felix Meschberger <[email protected]> > wrote: > +1, I assume we need to avoid introducing more dependencies than > currently exist for the non-OSGi case in logback, but apart from that > I like the idea....
...rereading that - what I mean is that using logback without OSGi should not require any changes, so our changes and their dependencies must be clearly optional. -Bertrand
