On 03.03.2013, at 00:05, Miroslav Smiljanic <[email protected]> wrote:
> Currently if A adapts to [B, D], and B adapts to [C], adapter manager will > not adapt A to C even if it is potentially possible. > > AdapterManager.getAdapter method has to be called twice. > I have done some code modifications and made operation transitive. > > Do you think that it would be worth to add this new capability to > AdapterManagerImpl? That sounds like a bit too much magic to me, I think it's better if devs are forced to explicitly adapt things one at a time.... Do you have a use case? Cheers, Alex
