On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 5:38 AM, Miroslav Smiljanic <[email protected]> wrote: > ...Proposed implementation change would just query that cache more that once, > what is currently done....
Yes, but from the user's point of view there's the additional magic of a transitive chain of adapters. I agree with others that that's too much magic - the adapter pattern potentially creates non-transparent code (when abused by adapting apples to oranges), if it's transitive the risk is even higher. -Bertrand
