I want to agree, but that means it has to be stable quickly to avoid lots of Sling API releases. Getting something near perfect first time is usually hard. Ian
On 8 May 2013 09:33, Felix Meschberger <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi > > I don't think we should have o.a.s.api packages outside of the api bundle. > This would be confusing. > > Regards > Felix > > -- > Felix Meschberger | Principal Scientist | [email protected] > > Am 07.05.2013 um 18:44 schrieb "Carsten Ziegeler" <[email protected]>: > > > The resource collection uses currently the package > > org.apache.sling.resource.collection. > > > > I'm wondering if we should follow the original proposal and use > > org.apache.sling.api.resource.collection instead? > > We can keep the api in the separate bundle until it's stable and then > move > > it the Sling API bundle and wouldn't need to change the package name but > > get a consistent package naming. > > > > WDYT? > > Carsten > > > > -- > > Carsten Ziegeler > > [email protected] >
