I think that we can keep it in current state, until it stabilizes. And let's not split api and impl for now, to avoid multiple releases.
-Amit -----Original Message----- From: Felix Meschberger [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: 08 May 2013 05:04 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [COLLECTION] API Package Hi I don't think we should have o.a.s.api packages outside of the api bundle. This would be confusing. Regards Felix -- Felix Meschberger | Principal Scientist | [email protected] Am 07.05.2013 um 18:44 schrieb "Carsten Ziegeler" <[email protected]>: > The resource collection uses currently the package > org.apache.sling.resource.collection. > > I'm wondering if we should follow the original proposal and use > org.apache.sling.api.resource.collection instead? > We can keep the api in the separate bundle until it's stable and then > move it the Sling API bundle and wouldn't need to change the package > name but get a consistent package naming. > > WDYT? > Carsten > > -- > Carsten Ziegeler > [email protected]
