Robert, I would admit I have not done extensive testing of the Geranimo JSTL implementation in Sling, however it seems at least the common tags work. Would there be any reason to re-bundle the JSTL implementation if it was already done by the Geranimo team?
Thanks, Dan ________________________________________ From: Csákány Róbert Sent: Friday, May 31, 2013 1:01 PM To: dev@sling.apache.org Subject: Re: Using Apache Geranimo JSTL Hi! I agree. I've use my own bundle for it - JSTL is very useful function to keep the JSP clean - and there is no potential regression https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-1793 The XML JSTL extension is ignored in Sling now, because when I was made this patch there was some unresolved import, so it is skipped now. I recommend to use this version - it worked for me well in the las 3 years. (I haven't tried, but he geronimo version may not working in sling). Regards, Robert On May 30, 2013, at 11:22 PM, Dan Klco <dan.k...@sixdimensions.com> wrote: > All, > > While working on getting integration tests set up for the new TagLib > functionality, I found that the Apache Geranimo project released a JSTL > bundle for their servlet container. > http://search.maven.org/#artifactdetails%7Corg.apache.geronimo.bundles%7Cjstl%7C1.2_1%7Cbundle > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2536 > > Would anyone be opposed to including this bundle in the Launchpad Builder? > Unless we need to modify the JSTL code, we could probably shutter the > existing Sling JSTL project as well. Right now the JSP I am using for > integration tests makes extensive use of JSTL and it would probably be > beneficial for developers overall to have access to JSTL in Sling 7. > > Thoughts? > > Thanks, > Dan > > ----- No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 2013.0.3343 / Virus Database: 3184/6366 - Release Date: 05/29/13
