On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 9:43 AM, Felix Meschberger <[email protected]> wrote: > ...In fact having written my previous messages, I wonder, whether our default > values we provide > to scripts (request, response, etc.) should not really be provided by a BVP > in the "request" (or such) > scope/context/usage ;-)
Yes, we could mark our own BVPs with context=request from now on, but the request processing script engines should also get any BVPs which do not have a "context" service property, for backwards compatibility. > ...Somehow I tend to get to the term "context" for this thing. Ok, that was my first idea and Justin's as well, "context" sounds good - I'll rephrase my proposal accordingly, coming up... -Bertrand
