[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-3217?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13809008#comment-13809008
]
Justin Edelson commented on SLING-3217:
---------------------------------------
Scripting variables and EL expresions have entirely separate namespaces. It is
true that users of <sling:defineObjects/> end up with the same baseline
variable names, as soon as you write any non-trivial code, the namespaces
diverge.
Consider that both of these (very contrived examples) will fail:
{code}
<sling:defineObjects/>
<% String path = resource.getPath() %>
${path}
{code}
{code}
<sling:defineObjects/>
<c:set var="path" value="${resource.path}"/>
<%= path %>
{code}
> Automatically expose SlingBindings object through EL
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SLING-3217
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-3217
> Project: Sling
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Scripting
> Reporter: Justin Edelson
> Attachments: SLING-3217.patch
>
>
> JSP scripts need to use the <sling:defineObjects/> (or a subclass) in order
> to expose the Sling Bindings objects (i.e. `resource`) for use in a JSP page.
> This shouldn't be necessary if we provide a custom ELResolver.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1#6144)