On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 11:21 AM, Carsten Ziegeler <[email protected]> wrote: > ...all this adds a lot of cruft to fix a single simple problem in a > logging implementation. I see the point that slf4j releases might take some > time, but I think that's the right place to fix it and avoids adding > additional stuff all over the place....
I agree...Chetan, do you see a possible workaround that would allow us to wait for the necessary slf4j releases, with minimal impact on our code? -Bertrand
