Hi, On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 3:25 PM, Robert Munteanu <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, 2015-07-20 at 15:12 +0200, Oliver Lietz wrote: >>... Although versions are cheap for us, it confuses our users when >> versions are >> "missing". It's even more confusing that AEM 6.1 uses Sling i18n >> 2.4.0 which >> was _not_ released. So I'm for reusing here. > > +1 for reusing versions on cancelled votes...
I am strongly against reusing version numbers when artifacts change. As soon as one creates a binary people can copy it around, there's no way to know if that happens or not. Having two versions of an artifact with the same version numbers can cause major confusion. Non-consecutive version numbers are not a problem. -Bertrand
