On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 12:53 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz < [email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Karl, > > On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 12:42 AM, Karl Pauls <[email protected]> wrote: > > ...It seems to me that at a minimum the NOTICE and LICENSE of the source > > release should be used for the binary as well, no?... > > Good catch - what happens is that the bundles/extensions/xss source > code provides its own NOTICE/LICENSE files, which might be needed for > the binary distribution as that embeds a number of things. > > But for some reason those files are only taken into account when > building the source archive. > > As you didn't -1 this vote I assume you are ok with releasing as is > and taking care of this issue separately? > Well, technically I guess, you have enough +1 votes already to do as you please so it really is up to you :-). Personally, however, I really don't like releasing artifacts with improper NOTICE/LICENSE files so I'm -1 but I can live with being overruled by the majority vote. I guess at a minimum I would make sure that the problem is fixed in trunk first so that it at least doesn't happen again. regards, Karl -Bertrand > -- Karl Pauls [email protected]
