On Friday, August 19, 2016, Karl Pauls <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 12:53 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz < > [email protected] > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> wrote: > >> Hi Karl, >> >> On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 12:42 AM, Karl Pauls <[email protected] >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> wrote: >> > ...It seems to me that at a minimum the NOTICE and LICENSE of the source >> > release should be used for the binary as well, no?... >> >> Good catch - what happens is that the bundles/extensions/xss source >> code provides its own NOTICE/LICENSE files, which might be needed for >> the binary distribution as that embeds a number of things. >> >> But for some reason those files are only taken into account when >> building the source archive. >> >> As you didn't -1 this vote I assume you are ok with releasing as is >> and taking care of this issue separately? >> > > Well, technically I guess, you have enough +1 votes already to do as you > please so it really is up to you :-). > > Personally, however, I really don't like releasing artifacts with improper > NOTICE/LICENSE files so I'm -1 but I can live with being overruled by the > majority > vote. > > I guess at a minimum I would make sure that the problem is fixed in trunk > first so that it at least doesn't happen again. >
I can try to look into it tonight if you want me too ... regards, Karl > regards, > > Karl > > -Bertrand >> > > > > -- > Karl Pauls > [email protected] <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');> > -- Karl Pauls [email protected] http://twitter.com/karlpauls http://www.linkedin.com/in/karlpauls https://profiles.google.com/karlpauls
