Hi Justin, On Wed, 2017-09-20 at 16:06 +0000, Justin Edelson wrote: > Hi, > While it is true that this project does not have an existing Github- > centric > workflow, I suspect that most of us use such a workflow on other > projects, > so I would be more in favor of the dual-master system.
Right, we can benefit from a Github-centric model, even if we don't have the whole setup ready by the time we complete the migration. Thanks, Robert > > Regards, > Justin > > On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 11:48 AM Robert Munteanu <romb...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > According to http://git.apache.org/ , there are two systems in use > > at > > the ASF: > > > > - the "Git Wip" system > > - the "Github Dual Master" > > > > I have not found any more information about these - Ian referenced > > the > > dual master some time ago [1], but AFAICT the "Wip" system is > > basically > > ASF hosted git mirrored to Github, while the "Dual Master" system > > allows us to push to Github as well as to the ASF Git. > > > > IMO the dual master system is for projects with a Github-centric > > workflow coming to the ASF, which is not our situation at all, so > > I'd > > go with the "Wip" system. > > > > What do others think? > > > > Thanks, > > > > Robert > > > > > > [1]: https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/b8b0003cf9fcb1c365a9ed354 > > fe7c > > 20c2c4c5b465c952829e0eb4c78@1458668880@%3Cdev.sling.apache.org%3E > >
