On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 9:06 PM, Robert Munteanu <romb...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi Justin, > > On Wed, 2017-09-20 at 16:06 +0000, Justin Edelson wrote: >> Hi, >> While it is true that this project does not have an existing Github- >> centric >> workflow, I suspect that most of us use such a workflow on other >> projects, >> so I would be more in favor of the dual-master system. > > Right, we can benefit from a Github-centric model, even if we don't > have the whole setup ready by the time we complete the migration.
Personally, I think if we move to git we should move to github as much as possible. Otherwise, what is the point. regards, Karl > Thanks, > > Robert > >> >> Regards, >> Justin >> >> On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 11:48 AM Robert Munteanu <romb...@apache.org> >> wrote: >> >> > Hi, >> > >> > According to http://git.apache.org/ , there are two systems in use >> > at >> > the ASF: >> > >> > - the "Git Wip" system >> > - the "Github Dual Master" >> > >> > I have not found any more information about these - Ian referenced >> > the >> > dual master some time ago [1], but AFAICT the "Wip" system is >> > basically >> > ASF hosted git mirrored to Github, while the "Dual Master" system >> > allows us to push to Github as well as to the ASF Git. >> > >> > IMO the dual master system is for projects with a Github-centric >> > workflow coming to the ASF, which is not our situation at all, so >> > I'd >> > go with the "Wip" system. >> > >> > What do others think? >> > >> > Thanks, >> > >> > Robert >> > >> > >> > [1]: https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/b8b0003cf9fcb1c365a9ed354 >> > fe7c >> > 20c2c4c5b465c952829e0eb4c78@1458668880@%3Cdev.sling.apache.org%3E >> > > -- Karl Pauls karlpa...@gmail.com
