Hmm interesting, I can't remember to change it, but apparently it got changed by my commit. That's a mistake.
I guess the best would be to revert that change and do another release WDYT? Carsten Oliver Lietz wrote > On Tuesday 13 March 2018 15:46:44 Julian Sedding wrote: >> Hi Oli >> >> I think it's ok, because ResourceResolver#getSearchPath() also returns >> String[]. So I think for consistency's sake we should leave it as-is. >> While I agree with you in principle, there are other examples where >> the singular term is used to refer to a list of paths, e.g. the java >> classpath. > > ACK, makes sense to be consistent. > > Why was package version for o.a.s.request increased? > > Thanks, Julian! > > O. > >> Regards >> Julian >> >> On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 3:24 PM, Oliver Lietz <apa...@oliverlietz.de> wrote: >>> On Tuesday 13 March 2018 08:36:14 Carsten Ziegeler wrote: >>>> Hi, >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>>> We solved 3 issues in this release: >>>> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/SLING/versions/12342301 >>> >>> SLING-7537: The method name should be getSearchPaths() instead of >>> getSearchPath() as it returns a list of strings (paths), no? >>> >>> Regards, >>> O. >>> >>> https://github.com/apache/sling-org-apache-sling-api/blob/master/src/main/ >>> java/org/apache/sling/api/resource/ResourceResolverFactory.java#L222 > -- Carsten Ziegeler Adobe Research Switzerland cziege...@apache.org
