On Sun, 2018-04-29 at 01:05 +0530, Hasini Witharana wrote: > Hi Robert, > > I have done some changes to the estimated schedule and end > deliverables > sections, in the proposal[1]. Please review and give your comments. > > [1] - > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ki_mv_ngtMFsP2cqZkVfZfAYLAYle6M5S > rs0WsgHXEs/edit?usp=sharing
Looks good overall. I would suggest moving the next iteration on the Apache Sling Wiki at https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SLING/ - please send me your username and I'll grant you the necessary rights. Also for the next iteration it would be good to understand what kind of testing you had in mind ( unit tests based on Mocks, integration testing based on 'live' servers, etc ). Robert > > Thank you. > > On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 4:54 PM, Robert Munteanu <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Hi Hasini, > > > > On Fri, 2018-04-27 at 00:37 +0530, Hasini Witharana wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > In OpenID Connect flow there are three main parties. > > > > > > 1. End-User - Resource owner > > > 2. OpenID Connect Provider - Authorization Server that is > > > capable > > > of > > > authenticating the End-User and providing claims to a Relying > > > Party about > > > the Authentication event and the End-User > > > 3. Relying Party - A client requiring End-User Authentication > > > and > > > Claims > > > from an OpenID Connect Provider. > > > > > > When considering the OIDC flow, does sling act as an OpenID > > > Connect > > > provider or a relying party? > > > > > > Sling IMO should act as a relying party. > > > > Robert > > > > >
