[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-7714?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16510708#comment-16510708
]
Ankit Aggarwal commented on SLING-7714:
---------------------------------------
[~mpetria]
In [^CQ-4245994_3.patch], I have provided the default value to the property
filters in addition to the fix in [^CQ-4245994.patch]
> SCD FileVault packages created with root filter which removes ACEs
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SLING-7714
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-7714
> Project: Sling
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Content Distribution
> Affects Versions: Content Distribution Core 0.2.10
> Reporter: Ankit Aggarwal
> Assignee: Timothee Maret
> Priority: Major
> Attachments: CQ-4245994.patch, CQ-4245994_2.patch,
> CQ-4245994_3.patch, faulty-pkg-4503-1.0.zip, pkg-4503-additionnal.zip,
> pkg-4503-base.zip, pre-SP2-1.0.zip
>
>
> After upgrading the customer stage instances (this is ManagedService), it has
> been observed that the user synchronization si broken.
> After investigation, I observed that not only the user sync is broken but
> possible the whole instance, as many "rep:policy" nodes have been removed.
>
> h4. Steps to reproduce
> # start a 3 instances (1 author, 2 publishers) setup on AEM 6.3
> # enable the user synchronization following the documentation
> # upgrade publishers to SP2, then author
> # create a new user on pub1
>
> Expected result:
> User is propagated/synchronized on pub2 without side-effect
>
> Actual result:
> User is propagated/synchronized on pub2, but the following rep:policy nodes
> are removed (maybe non exhaustive list):
> * /rep:policy
> * /home/rep:policy
> * /home/users/rep:policy
>
> I reproduce this issue and tested again the procedure, but I disabled the
> sync agent on Author, so that I could retrieve the package being replicated
> on the other publisher (pub2) to inspect its definition.
>
> [faulty-pkg-4503-1.0.zip^!/images/icons/link_attachment_7.gif|width=7,height=7,align=absmiddle!^|https://issues.apache.org/secure/attachment/2594552/2594552_faulty-pkg-4503-1.0.zip]
> is a raw package containing the "/var/sling/distribution" and
> "/var/eventing/jobs/unassigned" of pub1 where I created the new user post-SP2
> install, if you require more details.
>
> [pkg-4503-base.zip^!/images/icons/link_attachment_7.gif|width=7,height=7,align=absmiddle!^|https://issues.apache.org/secure/attachment/2594549/2594549_pkg-4503-base.zip]
> and
> [pkg-4503-additionnal.zip^!/images/icons/link_attachment_7.gif|width=7,height=7,align=absmiddle!^|https://issues.apache.org/secure/attachment/2594550/2594550_pkg-4503-additionnal.zip]
> are the actual packages that will be distributed by SCD, and installed on
> pub2. I extracted them from
> [faulty-pkg-4503-1.0.zip^!/images/icons/link_attachment_7.gif|width=7,height=7,align=absmiddle!^|https://issues.apache.org/secure/attachment/2594552/2594552_faulty-pkg-4503-1.0.zip]
> from the following path
> "faulty-pkg-4503-1.0.zip\jcr_root\var\sling\distribution\packages\socialpubsync-vlt\data\dstrpck-1528203802286-58c3aa28-a83a-4a74-a781-e48e5415a541\"
> and "dstrpck-1528203802288-c6416288-9b4d-43cc-8967-c09215bd6a91" (they are
> the "bin" file renamed).
>
> Checking their _META-INF\vault\filter.xml,_ I think that the filter
> definition is incorrect:
> {code:java}
> <workspaceFilter version="1.0">
> <filter root="/home/users/6">
> <include pattern="/home/users/6"/>
> </filter>
> <filter root="/home/users/6/68dhk9JC3OnZO5Z87rLR">
> <include pattern="/home/users/6/68dhk9JC3OnZO5Z87rLR"/>
> </filter>
> <filter root="/"/>
> </workspaceFilter>{code}
>
> *The last entry with filter on "/" looks suspicious.*
>
> On a pre-SP2 instance, I have the following which is correct:
> {code:java}
> <workspaceFilter version="1.0">
> <filter root="/home/users/L">
> <include pattern="/home/users/L"/>
> </filter>
> <filter root="/home/users/L/L3q-3NdVN-uV1eawzefF">
> <include pattern="/home/users/L/L3q-3NdVN-uV1eawzefF"/>
> </filter>
> </workspaceFilter>{code}
>
> I assume that the ACL are merged and as the filter is pointing to "/" and the
> package doesn't have any rep:policy for any nodes in the hierarchy, it is
> removing the existing ones.
>
> PS: I have some instances setup to share if needed.
> *Btw now that the issue is qualified I guess you only need to setup one
> single publisher, enable usersync, and create a new user. This should trigger
> the package creation containing the invalid filter definition.*
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
