Thanks Tommaso for your feedback, very appreciated!

I forgot to mention that @SlingFilter is also already supported, it can be
helpful let people (developers/managers/testers/...) know what's going on
the system, WDYT... could it be interesting also for debugging purposes,
making people aware what happens to requests?
TIA!
~Simo

http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/


On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 5:51 PM Tommaso Teofili <[email protected]> wrote:

> Thanks Simo,
>
> I think the idea is very interesting!
> When browsing source code, especially on github, that should help people
> better understand what components / services / etc. are doing.
> Being Sling a big project I think this is especially useful when browsing
> through portions of the code / bundles you are not using / developing
> frequently.
>
> My 2 cents,
> Tommaso
>
>
> Il giorno mar 31 lug 2018 alle ore 17:10 Robert Munteanu <
> [email protected]>
> ha scritto:
>
> > Hi Simo,
> >
> > On Tue, 2018-07-31 at 14:06 +0200, Simone Tripodi wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > > due to a private need I implemented a tool that, as a Sling
> > > committer, I
> > > would like to promote inside this community in order to have it as a
> > > public
> > > domain.
> > >
> > > The basic idea is to automate the production of documentation,
> > > providing to
> > > both developers and customers a centralised documentation of all HTTP
> > > entry
> > > points and Metatype configurations.
> >
> > This looks nice, thanks for bringing it up for discussion. I think we
> > could use a tool to enhance documentation for Sling.
> >
> > A couple of notes/questions:
> >
> > 1. The sample markdown output is wrapped, it would be more useful if
> > attached as a plain-text file.
> >
> > 2. Is there any support for removing certain classes or properties from
> > the output? I can see situations where we don't want to expose
> > something, based on whether it's deprecated or internal.
> >
> > 3. Is there support (or planned support) for adding additional data to
> > the output? I think a plain descriptive output for a certain component
> > is good, but it might be useful to complement it with other
> > information, such as a free-text description.
> >
> > 4. Does this tool depend on Sling in any matter? Briefly looking over
> > your email it looks like it builds on top of the OSGi annotations ( +
> > Felix/Sling specific ones ) so it could also potentially find a home in
> > the Felix project.
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > Robert
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to