Hi there Konrad,
thank you su much for your interest, very appreciated!

> What about instead acting on top of the generated component definitions or
> metatype resources? That way you would be independent of how they have been
> generated?
> Konrad


I have also an implementation of this policy, but that approach didn't let
me really satisfied: IMHO the direct access to the source code, handling
proper types and so on, keeps the tool source code cleaner and easier to
read/maintain, rather than having an interpreter which deals with multiple
string.

Maybe is a matter of tastes, but I see you point: what I am proposing is a
Swiss Knife while a single Sword could cut them all.
I'll think twice about that :)

Thanks and all the best,
~Simo

http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/

Reply via email to