Badging should be possible, I'm not sure right now we have an example of
deprecated projects which are in GitHub. If someone wanted to point me to
one, I could check why it's not badged properly.

A few additional thoughts/questions:

   - As an interim, could we prepend deprecated / obsolete repos with a H1
   to the effect of "This module has been [deprecated|replaced] [link to new
   module / discussion"
   - Ideally, to support badging / displaying the deprecated repositories
   together they should be in the aggregator/default.xml list
   - Ideally, the master branch of the repository would contain the code at
   the final state for the project before deprecation -- that way we can read
   it in the badge generator and modules list scripts
   - Ideally, we'd also keep an authoritative list of the repos which are
   deprecated so we can drive the list and badges off that


On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 4:55 AM Stefan Seifert <sseif...@pro-vision.de>
wrote:

> i think as well we should not delete the git repository.
> adding a badge makes sense.
>
> additionally in github there is an option to "archive" a repository [1] -
> it's then set to readonly for everyone and github displays a label
> "Archived" in the repository list and a warning message if anything from
> the repo itself is displayed. if need arise it can be un-archived as well.
> i suppose this can only be done by infra.
>
> stefan
>
> [1] https://help.github.com/articles/archiving-a-github-repository/
>
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Carsten Ziegeler [mailto:cziege...@apache.org]
> >Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2019 10:49 AM
> >To: dev@sling.apache.org
> >Subject: How to we handle deprecated modules?
> >
> >Hi
> >
> >with svn we moved deprecated/obsolete modules to the attic
> >
> >How do we handle this now with git?
> >
> >The thread at [1] seems to suggest batches.
> >
> >I personally don't like having git repositories around which should not
> >be used. On the other hand, removing the git repo has some disadvantages
> >as well.
> >
> >WDYT?
> >
> >[1]
> >
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/63719253a3f3659e4e24009e2e8e212a1c9bb7
> >7fddc696b7720000d9@%3Cdev.sling.apache.org%3E
> >
> >Regards
> >Carsten
> >--
> >Carsten Ziegeler
> >Adobe Research Switzerland
> >cziege...@apache.org
>
>

Reply via email to