> You can pin the dependency to a particular snapshot revision... the problem > is those revisions don't stay in snapshot repositories forever
Ah, I see. Presumably Solr could avoid this though by copying/republishing the particular snapshot we want our builds to use under the "org.apache.solr" groupId. e.g. Until 9.0 happens, Solr builds could rely on "org.apache.solr:lucene-core-frozen:9.0.0-SNAPSHOT" which Solr devs update at their leisure to point to different actual Lucene snapshots. If 9.0.0 is going to happen in the short term that's probably more trouble than it's worth. But if Solr's build breaks a few more times and 9.0.0 still seems distant it may seem worth the hassle at some point. But that's a bridge we can cross if we come to it I guess, and I'm thread hijacking at this point. Thanks guys. On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 8:28 AM Dawid Weiss <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Wrt SNAPSHOT, I think we just need to be patient until Lucene releases > > 9.0.0, then we can depend on that instead, and choose our own timing for > > upgrading. > > You can pin the dependency to a particular snapshot revision... the > problem is those revisions don't stay in snapshot repositories forever > and once they're removed > you wouldn't be able to download/ resolve them. > > D. > > > > > Jan > > > > 15. apr. 2021 kl. 13:59 skrev Jason Gerlowski <[email protected]>: > > > > FYI, Mike Drob filed a separate issue for this yesterday (SOLR-15339). > > His ticket doesn't have a PR though so maybe that one should be closed > > as a duplicate? > > > > I'm sure this has been discussed previously and I just missed it - but > > is there a way for us to lock the Solr build on a particular Lucene > > 9.0.0-SNAPSHOT build instead of continually pulling in the latest? > > That'd allow us to handle these API breaks in batches at our > > convenience, instead of having it happen as a "surprise" that we can't > > really control. Or did we decide against that approach for some > > reason? > > > > Best, > > > > Jason > > > > On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 7:23 AM Jan Høydahl <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > > Due to https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9387 being committed, > > removing some methods in Lucene. > > > > Issue https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15341 to track this. > > > > Jan > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
