Solr can build a 9.0.0-solr-20210430 version and push it to internal ASF repo, can't we?
Jan > 30. apr. 2021 kl. 16:41 skrev Mike Drob <[email protected]>: > > Note that this happened again last night, and Jason was able to > quickly fix it. But it makes things like 'git bisect' impossible to > chase a bug because none of the older versions will compile. > > I don't think we can pin to a SNAPSHOT version because there are no > guarantees about how long those versions stick around. Maybe we can > ask Lucene to release a 9.0.0-alpha just so that we have some kind of > tag that we can stick to, with the understanding that this alpha tag > has no guarantees about future compatibility. > > On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 2:36 AM Dawid Weiss <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> But how do you pin to an intermediate version without a snapshot maven >> repository that would keep those pinned artifacts? >> >> Dawid >> >> On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 9:45 PM David Smiley <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> +1 Jan, that sounds complementary to what I propose. We'd get >>> notifications via Jenkins that there are some compatibility issues. But >>> we'd still pin a version and upgrade at a time of our choosing. >>> >>> ~ David Smiley >>> Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer >>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 11:35 AM Jan Høydahl <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> It could be feasible to let Jenkins do a periodic run (weekly?) of main >>>> branch with lucene SNAPSHOT. We can perhaps define a gradle property to >>>> override lucene version? -Dlucene.version=10.0.0-SNAPSHOT which Jenkins >>>> could easily trigger. I think a similar thought has been discussed before. >>>> >>>> Jan >>>> >>>> 29. apr. 2021 kl. 17:20 skrev Gus Heck <[email protected]>: >>>> >>>> We should still have some way of detecting these breakages early rather >>>> than later (or worse yet after lucene has released something). The easiest >>>> time to fix a problem is before someone else built on top of it. >>>> >>>> On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 11:15 AM Jason Gerlowski <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> +1 >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 11:12 AM Jan Høydahl >>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> +1 to pin. There will probably be a few more months until 9.0 given that >>>>>> 8.9 must be released first etc. >>>>>> >>>>>> Jan >>>>>> >>>>>> 29. apr. 2021 kl. 17:08 skrev David Smiley <[email protected]>: >>>>>> >>>>>> There have been some discussions previously about whether to pin the >>>>>> Lucene snapshot version until 9.0 is out, so that we update it manually >>>>>> instead of it being ~daily. Most recently in Slack but also this thread >>>>>> "Solr fails with current lucene-9.0.0-SNAPSHOT (LUCENE-9387)". I think >>>>>> the rate of spontaneous breaking has increased beyond my comfort level >>>>>> from being ambivalent on the matter to preferring more control of when >>>>>> we update. I know that may be as late as possible :-) but it minimizes >>>>>> surprises/disruptions. If there are no vetos on the matter in this >>>>>> thread, I'll throw up a PR. >>>>>> >>>>>> ~ David Smiley >>>>>> Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer >>>>>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> http://www.needhamsoftware.com (work) >>>> http://www.the111shift.com (play) >>>> >>>> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
