Maybe Tim you may have an opinion on this one as you introduced this watch
limit violation checker in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6370 ?
Running just about any SolrCloud based test will cause this to dump some
info at the end.  Even simple ones like
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.CloudSolrClientTest#queryWithLocalShardsPreferenceRulesTest

10089 WARN  (ZkTestServer Run Thread) [] o.a.s.c.ZkTestServer Watch limit
violations:
Maximum concurrent create/delete watches above limit:

13 /solr/collections/localShardsTestColl/terms/shard2
13 /solr/collections/localShardsTestColl/terms/shard1
9 /solr/collections/localShardsTestColl/terms/shard3
4 /solr/aliases.json
4 /solr/clusterprops.json
3 /solr/collections/localShardsTestColl/collectionprops.json
3 /solr/packages.json
3 /solr/security.json
3 /solr/configs/conf

Maximum concurrent data watches above limit:

51 /solr/collections/localShardsTestColl/state.json

Maximum concurrent children watches above limit:

23 /solr/collections/localShardsTestColl/state.json
16 /solr/live_nodes
8 /solr/collections
3 /solr/overseer/collection-queue-work

~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley


On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 5:20 PM David Smiley <[email protected]> wrote:

> I've noticed that it's quite common for a SolrCloud based test to conclude
> with warnings about "Watch limit violations".  I don't know how to
> interpret these violations; it's normal to get them. Can someone offer
> insights as to what this matter is about and what we ought to do about it?
>
> 63605 WARN  (ZkTestServer Run Thread) [     ] o.a.s.c.ZkTestServer Watch
> limit violations:
> Maximum concurrent create/delete watches above limit:
>
> 4 /solr/aliases.json
> 4 /solr/clusterprops.json
> 3 /solr/packages.json
> 3 /solr/security.json
> 2 /solr/collections/ping_test/terms/shard2
> 2 /solr/collections/ping_test/terms/shard1
> 2 /solr/configs/conf
>
> ~ David Smiley
> Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
>

Reply via email to