+1, agree with Mark. Let's not rush. On Thu, 31 Mar, 2022, 11:38 pm Mark Miller, <[email protected]> wrote:
> Just going to throw this out there, but I don’t think you have to know > much of anything about the likely quality and impact of changes from Lucene > 9.1 to say that raising the king dependency for a software project by a > full dot release is def not “respin and another quick round of smokes > material” even if this wasn’t an abnormal major release train. > > I can’t imagine how you wouldn’t want to add some meaningful breathing > room gap even with the best of confidence in those changes and all the ways > they might interact with Solr. > > Maybe that breathing room shows up anyway due to unrelated issues along > the lines of SQL support, but seems to me the total potential impact gamble > pretty easily says you’d want to bake that time into your vote to pull that > trigger regardless. > > > > Mark >
