Did we already tag something as 9.0.0 in our Git repo? I understand the unpleasantness of having our first release be 9.0.1 but that might be the easiest way forward.
On Wed, Apr 13, 2022 at 4:59 PM Anshum Gupta <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks for the update, Houston. > > I think this calls for an RC4. > > I'll be happy to review the PRs as they come in. > > On Wed, Apr 13, 2022 at 2:32 PM Houston Putman <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hello everyone, >> >> Unfortunately, while the build passed I noticed some issues when building >> the remaining infrastructure to finish the release process (A fair amount >> of stuff left to do since the docker and gradle migration). >> >> The biggest issue I found was that the solr-core maven artifact cannot be >> used, since it still relies on the solr-server artifact, which doesn't >> exist. There are also modules that don't have maven artifacts created. (And >> module artifacts rely on solr-core, so they also cannot be used) >> >> I think this warrants an RC4 (and while we do have the RC3 release >> artifacts in https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/solr/solr/), we >> can work with Apache infra to get that removed. >> >> If y'all think we should continue with the release anyways, I can do that >> as well. Will wait for some consensus while continuing to build in the >> necessary release steps. (for RC3 or RC4) >> >> Will have a fair number of PRs coming up to fix these things, so help >> reviewing them would be much appreciated. >> >> - Houston >> >> On Fri, Apr 8, 2022 at 6:55 PM Jan Høydahl <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> It's been >72h since the vote was initiated and the result is: >>> >>> +1 7 (7 binding) >>> 0 1 >>> -1 0 >>> >>> This vote has PASSED >>> >>> Congratulations everyone for reaching this milestone! >>> >>> There are still a few loose ends before the release can be published and >>> announced. >>> I'm away the next week, and Houston Putman has agreed to take over the >>> RM job from here. >>> >>> Thanks for stepping up Houston! >>> >>> Jan >>> >>> 8. apr. 2022 kl. 23:43 skrev Mike Drob <[email protected]>: >>> >>> If we're not doing anything with the release artifacts anyway (since >>> you'll be on holiday, Jan), would it be fine to leave it open over the >>> weekend? I didn't get nearly the amount of testing done on this that I >>> wanted to, mainly trying to figure out if SOLR-16143 was a real problem >>> (yes) or just a test issue (no) or worthy of blocking a release (probably >>> not). >>> >>> On Fri, Apr 8, 2022 at 4:40 PM Anshum Gupta <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> and just around the deadline, I got the smoke-tester to pass. Thanks to >>>> everyone who helped :) >>>> >>>> I changed a ton of things but most likely, it was an init.gradle file >>>> with some random stuff that was causing the issue. I remember having >>>> deleted that file a few months ago, but not sure what job regenerates that >>>> and adds that to the ~/.gradle folder. >>>> >>>> Here's my +1 (binding) >>>> SUCCESS! [0:46:31.241458] >>>> >>>> Also, tested SolrJ and some basic search/indexing using some sample app. >>>> >>>> >>>> On Fri, Apr 8, 2022 at 1:06 PM Jan Høydahl <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> This vote ends in an hour or so. >>>>> While there are currently five +1's and a few +0, I feel it is >>>>> inconclusive due to the SolrCell issue? >>>>> Kevin, guess your vote will decide :) >>>>> >>>>> Jan >>>>> >>>>> 8. apr. 2022 kl. 18:00 skrev Kevin Risden <[email protected]>: >>>>> >>>>> The smoke tester passed for me: SUCCESS! [0:54:21.639508] >>>>> >>>>> However, I'm running into issues checking Tika integration / Solr >>>>> Cell. Following >>>>> https://nightlies.apache.org/solr/draft-guides/solr-reference-guide-nightly/solr/9_0/indexing-guide/indexing-with-tika.html >>>>> >>>>> 2022-04-08 14:52:18.768 ERROR (qtp201274566-26) [] >>>>>> o.a.s.s.SolrRequestParsers Couldn't get multipart parts in order to >>>>>> delete >>>>>> them => java.lang.IllegalStateException: No multipart config for servlet >>>>>> at org.eclipse.jetty.server.Request.getParts(Request.java:2420) >>>>>> java.lang.IllegalStateException: No multipart config for servlet >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I tried curl and the bin/post examples and they didn't work. I also >>>>> tried running Solr with "./bin/solr -e schemaless >>>>> -Dsolr.module=extraction" >>>>> but the behavior was the same. >>>>> >>>>> This happened to be the first module I started trying to make sure I >>>>> didn't break anything with tons of the module changes in 9.0. I know SQL >>>>> issues were fixed. >>>>> >>>>> Anshum - I can try to help debug the security manager stuff on the >>>>> ticket you filed https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16135 >>>>> >>>>> Kevin Risden >>>>> >>>>> Kevin Risden >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Apr 7, 2022 at 5:28 PM Anshum Gupta <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> I can't seem to get the smoketest to pass on this RC, like the >>>>>> previous two. >>>>>> >>>>>> At this point, I've tried: >>>>>> - Fresh clone of the repository >>>>>> - Multiple JDK versions from JDK11, 14, 17 >>>>>> - Cleanup gradle cache >>>>>> - Multiple machines (Macbook and iMac) >>>>>> >>>>>> At this point I have the HDFS module tests and the adminUI test >>>>>> failing with SecurityManager related exceptions e.g. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> *org.apache.solr.hdfs.store.HdfsDirectoryTest > classMethod FAILED >>>>>> java.security.AccessControlException: access denied >>>>>> ("java.io.FilePermission" >>>>>> "/Users/anshumg/workspace/apache/solr/solr/modules/hdfs/build/tmp" >>>>>> "write")* >>>>>> >>>>>> I don't have a custom security policy and even running with >>>>>> *-Djava.security.debug=access,failure,policy >>>>>> *didn't get any useful information. >>>>>> >>>>>> I'll continue looking into it, but if I don't get anywhere, I'll vote >>>>>> based on my custom tests and manual testing. >>>>>> >>>>>> -Anshum >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, Apr 5, 2022 at 2:58 PM Jan Høydahl <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Please vote for release candidate 3 for Solr 9.0.0 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The artifacts can be downloaded from: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/solr/solr-9.0.0-RC3-rev-e9e64f83a8c972b5a3f3460899c81ee9ccde2d1e >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You can run the smoke tester directly with this command: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \ >>>>>>> >>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/solr/solr-9.0.0-RC3-rev-e9e64f83a8c972b5a3f3460899c81ee9ccde2d1e >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You are encouraged to do an extra thorough test and manual >>>>>>> inspection beyond >>>>>>> running the smoketester, since this is a major release. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You can build a release-candidate of the official docker image using >>>>>>> the following command: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> DIST_BASE=https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/solr && \ >>>>>>> >>>>>>> RC_FOLDER=solr-9.0.0-RC3-rev-e9e64f83a8c972b5a3f3460899c81ee9ccde2d1e >>>>>>> && \ >>>>>>> docker build $DIST_BASE/$RC_FOLDER/solr/docker/Dockerfile.official >>>>>>> \ >>>>>>> --build-arg >>>>>>> SOLR_DOWNLOAD_URL=$DIST_BASE/$RC_FOLDER/solr/solr-9.0.0.tgz \ >>>>>>> -t solr-rc:9.0.0-3 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours i.e. until 2022-04-08 >>>>>>> 22:00 UTC. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> [ ] +1 approve >>>>>>> [ ] +0 no opinion >>>>>>> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Here is my +1 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> SUCCESS! [0:46:42.638796] >>>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Anshum Gupta >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Anshum Gupta >>>> >>> >>> > > -- > Anshum Gupta >
