I agree that JIRA is one extra step that is not adding a lot of value.
Github issues are definitely better

On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 3:04 PM David Smiley <dsmi...@apache.org> wrote:

> Sharing for visibility.
>
> ~ David Smiley
> Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ---------
> From: Jeb Nix (Jira) <j...@apache.org>
> Date: Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 7:11 PM
> Subject: [jira] [Created] (SOLR-16455) Migrate Jira to Github Issues and
> Github Projects, and migrate mailing lists to Github Discussions
> To: <iss...@solr.apache.org>
>
>
> Jeb Nix created SOLR-16455:
> ------------------------------
>
>              Summary: Migrate Jira to Github Issues and Github Projects,
> and migrate mailing lists to Github Discussions
>                  Key: SOLR-16455
>                  URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16455
>              Project: Solr
>           Issue Type: Wish
>       Security Level: Public (Default Security Level. Issues are Public)
>           Components: github
>             Reporter: Jeb Nix
>
>
> GitHub is where people are at when they lookup for Solr (or basically any
> project). Most of the modern projects that have been started with Jira and
> mailing lists have migrated to Github in the last few years. Lucene did
> that just now for the Issues which has allowed me to explore much more of
> their issues. GitHub works great and many think that it works even better
> (I think that there is no doubt that it is working better for the
> Discussions vs. Mailing lists).
>
> I suggest here a pretty heavy move, that personally will allow me to start
> anticipating within Solr's community (since I really don't like the mailing
> lists nor Jira), and I think that there are much more like me out there. In
> my opinion, when the issues are managed on Github, it is much simpler to
> collaborate and they will get wider exposure since developers are spending
> time on Github anyway (whether if it's for their projects or for looking at
> the actual source code). It is also important to mention that it is pretty
> cumbersome for a new contributor that wants to add stuff to Solr, to talk
> about this via mail, then translate them to Jira of the issues, and just
> after that submit a PR on Github. e.g. 3 different systems for each
> process.
>
> Actually, I thought such a great move (for me at least) would never happen
> in Solr in the next years since I didn't think that the community sees &
> understands the many advantages yet. But now that the Lucene guys did this,
> I believe that it is possible for Solr too.
>
>
>
> --
> This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
> (v8.20.10#820010)
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@solr.apache.org
>


-- 
-----------------------------------------------------
Noble Paul

Reply via email to