Hi Michael, yes! Doing it right now!

Cheers
--------------------------
*Alessandro Benedetti*
Director @ Sease Ltd.
*Apache Lucene/Solr Committer*
*Apache Solr PMC Member*

e-mail: a.benede...@sease.io


*Sease* - Information Retrieval Applied
Consulting | Training | Open Source

Website: Sease.io <http://sease.io/>
LinkedIn <https://linkedin.com/company/sease-ltd> | Twitter
<https://twitter.com/seaseltd> | Youtube
<https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCDx86ZKLYNpI3gzMercM7BQ> | Github
<https://github.com/seaseltd>


On Fri, 6 Jan 2023 at 17:18, Michael Gibney <mich...@michaelgibney.net>
wrote:

> Alessandro, are you still looking to include the SOLR-16588 bugfix?
> Ishan, any updates on the handful of tasks that you had mentioned were
> still outstanding from the 9.1.0 release? Aside from these two open
> questions, it looks like branch_9_1 has settled down with all of the
> changes we had discussed for inclusion in 9.1.1 (unless I'm missing
> something).
> Michael
>
> On Thu, Jan 5, 2023 at 4:50 PM Alessandro Benedetti
> <a.benede...@sease.io> wrote:
> >
> > discussing on the PR, once clarified a bit around Lucene94 (and a
> backport
> > to Lucene 9.3 ad hoc for 9.1.1) we should be ready to merge and cherry
> pick!
> >
> > --------------------------
> > *Alessandro Benedetti*
> > Director @ Sease Ltd.
> > *Apache Lucene/Solr Committer*
> > *Apache Solr PMC Member*
> >
> > e-mail: a.benede...@sease.io
> >
> >
> > *Sease* - Information Retrieval Applied
> > Consulting | Training | Open Source
> >
> > Website: Sease.io <http://sease.io/>
> > LinkedIn <https://linkedin.com/company/sease-ltd> | Twitter
> > <https://twitter.com/seaseltd> | Youtube
> > <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCDx86ZKLYNpI3gzMercM7BQ> | Github
> > <https://github.com/seaseltd>
> >
> >
> > On Wed, 4 Jan 2023 at 23:26, Michael Gibney <mich...@michaelgibney.net>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > This seems fine to me, assuming no objections from others.
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jan 4, 2023 at 4:30 PM Alessandro Benedetti
> > > <a.benede...@sease.io> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > What about including this as well in 9.1.1 :
> > > > https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1255 ?
> > > > It's an annoying neural search bug, and it's pretty much done, just
> > > waiting
> > > > for a few checks and then I'll merge it with the changes!
> > > > --------------------------
> > > > *Alessandro Benedetti*
> > > > Director @ Sease Ltd.
> > > > *Apache Lucene/Solr Committer*
> > > > *Apache Solr PMC Member*
> > > >
> > > > e-mail: a.benede...@sease.io
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > *Sease* - Information Retrieval Applied
> > > > Consulting | Training | Open Source
> > > >
> > > > Website: Sease.io <http://sease.io/>
> > > > LinkedIn <https://linkedin.com/company/sease-ltd> | Twitter
> > > > <https://twitter.com/seaseltd> | Youtube
> > > > <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCDx86ZKLYNpI3gzMercM7BQ> | Github
> > > > <https://github.com/seaseltd>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, 3 Jan 2023 at 17:18, Shawn Heisey <apa...@elyograg.org>
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > On 1/3/23 08:05, Michael Gibney wrote:
> > > > > > and possibly upgrade to Lucene 9.4
> > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16442
> > > > > > particularly considering:
> > > > > > https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/11718
> > > > >
> > > > > It seems like a bad idea to upgrade a critical component to a new
> major
> > > > > or minor version in a bugfix release, unless that upgrade closes a
> > > > > security vulnerability and is fairly limited in scope.  I don't
> think
> > > > > either of those applies.
> > > > >
> > > > > Solr 9.1.0 includes Lucene 9.3.0.  There are no further 9.3.x
> releases,
> > > > > so we don't have that as an option.
> > > > >
> > > > > > The main concerns for all the above are classloading issues. The
> > > first
> > > > > > one (SlotAcc) I think should be backported, since we know it has
> > > > > > manifested in the wild and it's a very self-contained fix.
> > > > >
> > > > > My bias would be to NOT upgrade Lucene, for reasons described
> above.
> > > > > The change on SOLR-16165 looks OK to me for a point release.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Shawn
> > > > >
> > > > >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org
> > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org
> > >
> > >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org
>
>

Reply via email to