If it's non-trivial and you're super confident, commit directly. Otherwise, throw up a PR (or patch) immediately.
I looked at your patch here. +1 from me. ~ David Smiley Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley On Tue, May 2, 2023 at 2:01 PM Eric Pugh <ep...@opensourceconnections.com> wrote: > What is the best way to fix this? I went into branch_9x and checked, and > yeah, I totally goofed it somehow….. > > Can I commit the attached patch directly to branch_9x? > > > > On May 2, 2023, at 3:53 AM, Jan Høydahl <jan....@cominvent.com> wrote: > > Last successful jenkins "check" on branch_9x was 26 days ago: > https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Solr/job/Solr-Check-9.x/ > > Errors like this > > 1. ERROR in > /tmp/src/solr/solr/solrj/src/java/org/apache/solr/client/solrj/impl/ConcurrentUpdateSolrClient.java > (at line 119) > this.pollQueueTimeMillis = builder.pollQueueTime; > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > pollQueueTimeMillis cannot be resolved or is not a field > > https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Solr/job/Solr-Check-9.x/lastBuild/console > > I think perhaps backport of > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13605 was the cause? > > Jan > > > _______________________ > *Eric Pugh **| *Founder & CEO | OpenSource Connections, LLC | 434.466.1467 > | http://www.opensourceconnections.com | My Free/Busy > <http://tinyurl.com/eric-cal> > Co-Author: Apache Solr Enterprise Search Server, 3rd Ed > <https://www.packtpub.com/big-data-and-business-intelligence/apache-solr-enterprise-search-server-third-edition-raw> > This e-mail and all contents, including attachments, is considered to be > Company Confidential unless explicitly stated otherwise, regardless > of whether attachments are marked as such. > >
