The PR is already merged, and if it had not been for the broken CollectionReloadTest, branch_9x would have been fine again...
Jan > 3. mai 2023 kl. 15:13 skrev David Smiley <dsmi...@apache.org>: > > If it's non-trivial and you're super confident, commit directly. Otherwise, > throw up a PR (or patch) immediately. > > I looked at your patch here. +1 from me. > > ~ David Smiley > Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer > http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley > > > On Tue, May 2, 2023 at 2:01 PM Eric Pugh <ep...@opensourceconnections.com > <mailto:ep...@opensourceconnections.com>> wrote: >> What is the best way to fix this? I went into branch_9x and checked, and >> yeah, I totally goofed it somehow….. >> >> Can I commit the attached patch directly to branch_9x? >> >> >> >>> On May 2, 2023, at 3:53 AM, Jan Høydahl <jan....@cominvent.com >>> <mailto:jan....@cominvent.com>> wrote: >>> >>> Last successful jenkins "check" on branch_9x was 26 days ago: >>> https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Solr/job/Solr-Check-9.x/ >>> >>> Errors like this >>> >>> 1. ERROR in >>> /tmp/src/solr/solr/solrj/src/java/org/apache/solr/client/solrj/impl/ConcurrentUpdateSolrClient.java >>> (at line 119) >>> this.pollQueueTimeMillis = builder.pollQueueTime; >>> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ >>> pollQueueTimeMillis cannot be resolved or is not a field >>> https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Solr/job/Solr-Check-9.x/lastBuild/console >>> >>> I think perhaps backport of >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13605 was the cause? >>> >>> Jan >> >> _______________________ >> Eric Pugh | Founder & CEO | OpenSource Connections, LLC | 434.466.1467 | >> http://www.opensourceconnections.com <http://www.opensourceconnections.com/> >> | My Free/Busy <http://tinyurl.com/eric-cal> >> Co-Author: Apache Solr Enterprise Search Server, 3rd Ed >> <https://www.packtpub.com/big-data-and-business-intelligence/apache-solr-enterprise-search-server-third-edition-raw> >> >> This e-mail and all contents, including attachments, is considered to be >> Company Confidential unless explicitly stated otherwise, regardless of >> whether attachments are marked as such. >>
