Whatever we do here, just a note to test dev-tools/cloud.sh script. It's
broken on master now from some seemingly related changes...

Final NUM_NODES is        4
graph/solr-10.0.0-SNAPSHOT/bin/solr -c -s
/Users/gus/projects/apache/solr/testing/graph/n1 -z
localhost:2181/solr__Users_gus_projects_apache_solr_testing_graph -p 8981
-m 1g -a -agentlib:jdwp=transport=dt_socket,server=y,suspend=n,address=5001
-Dsolr.solrxml.location=zookeeper
-Dsolr.log.dir=/Users/gus/projects/apache/solr/testing/graph/n1
-c is not a valid command!

It's a pretty useful script since it is a one-touch recompile/redeploy of a
local 4 node (or any other number of nodes) cluster that automatically has
debugging enabled on all nodes.

On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 4:58 PM David Smiley <david.w.smi...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> > So, thoughts maybe on eliminating create_core and create_collection?
> Assuming we have the mode aware create command?
>
> +1 to eliminate though, simplifying to a smarter simpler "create" that is
> aware of the mode.
>
> I don't think I like Houston's proposal of it giving instructions on
> switching the modes; it seems to me like arbitrary help unrelated to
> create.
>
> ~ David
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 1:20 PM Eric Pugh <ep...@opensourceconnections.com
> >
> wrote:
>
> > So, sounds like you are in agreement that we should keep create, and make
> > it smart about the mode you are in when we dump out the -h output.
>  Plus,
> > some informational hand holding.
> >
> > So, thoughts maybe on eliminating create_core and create_collection?
> > Assuming we have the mode aware create command?    This would match up
> with
> > the pattern of the delete command, which doesn’t have a delete_core or
> > delete_collection variant ;-)
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > On Jul 13, 2023, at 10:33 AM, Houston Putman <houstonput...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >>
> > >> What if, when you run bin/solr create -h, we actually detect if you
> are
> > in
> > >> solrcloud mode and then delegate to either create_collection or
> > create_core
> > >> to decide the help output?
> > >
> > >
> > > If we are going to have the command, this is absolutely what it should
> > do.
> > > And with -h, it can say that it is in <> mode, and that to create a
> > > collection/core then please ensure you are using the right options.
> > > (Basically giving them the instructions to switch to cloud/standalone
> if
> > > they somehow are in the wrong mode)
> > >
> > > - Houston
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 8:03 AM Eric Pugh <
> > ep...@opensourceconnections.com <mailto:ep...@opensourceconnections.com
> >>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> Some good food for thought here….    I hadn’t really dug quite so much
> > >> into the specifics of the flow.
> > >>
> > >> Do we think that having a generic “create” is making things simpler,
> or
> > >> being more verbose and having create_core and create_collection
> suffice?
> > >> I guess I am wondering if there are good arguments for keeping create?
> > >> Mostly because when you run “bin/solr create -h”, we give the help
> > output
> > >> for the “create_collection” command…
> > >>
> > >> One thought….  What if, when you run bin/solr create -h, we actually
> > >> detect if you are in solrcloud mode and then delegate to either
> > >> create_collection or create_core to decide the help output?
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>> On Jul 9, 2023, at 4:28 PM, Shawn Heisey <apa...@elyograg.org>
> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> On 7/8/23 15:03, Ishan Chattopadhyaya wrote:
> > >>>> I'd rather we remove all three and encourage users to issue API
> > commands
> > >>>> via curl.
> > >>>> I'm very much in favour of the scripts being used for only essential
> > >> tasks,
> > >>>> but not for things where the API can be used. With the APIs being
> the
> > >>>> primary means to achieve tasks, users develop more familiarity when
> > >>>> starting out.
> > >>>
> > >>> If configs are already uploaded to ZK, creating collections works
> with
> > >> just the API in cloud mode.  The bin/solr option will do the config
> > upload
> > >> for you before creating the collection.
> > >>>
> > >>> Out of the box, standalone mode can't create a core completely with
> the
> > >> API.  If standalone mode is configured with configsets, then it can.
> > If we
> > >> do keep the bin/solr create option for standalone mode, I would like
> > for it
> > >> to be able to detect what user Solr is running as and fail if the
> create
> > >> command is running under a different user.
> > >>>
> > >>> There has been discussion about making future versions of Solr
> default
> > >> to cloud mode.  The API limitation for creating cores in standalone
> > mode is
> > >> one thing in favor of that change.
> > >>>
> > >>> I have been trying to think of ways we can automate the deployment
> of a
> > >> SolrCloud install, especially a high availability cluster that has
> > three or
> > >> more nodes.  We have a solr service installer, I think we should also
> > >> provide a ZK service installer.  I don't think it would be a good plan
> > to
> > >> have that whole idea use the embedded ZK, because with the embedded
> ZK,
> > >> stopping or restarting Solr also takes down one of the ZK nodes.
> > >>>
> > >>> Even though I personally don't think of Windows as a viable platform
> > for
> > >> running Solr, others do, so I think there should be service installers
> > for
> > >> Windows.  Picking a service wrapper is something we could bikeshed
> > forever
> > >> on.  Another thing to decide is whether to support 32-bit Windows or
> > just
> > >> 64-bit.  I think it should just be 64-bit.
> > >>>
> > >>> Thanks,
> > >>> Shawn
> > >>>
> > >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org
> > >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >> _______________________
> > >> Eric Pugh | Founder & CEO | OpenSource Connections, LLC |
> 434.466.1467 |
> > >> http://www.opensourceconnections.com <
> > >> http://www.opensourceconnections.com/> | My Free/Busy <
> > >> http://tinyurl.com/eric-cal>
> > >> Co-Author: Apache Solr Enterprise Search Server, 3rd Ed <
> > >>
> >
> https://www.packtpub.com/big-data-and-business-intelligence/apache-solr-enterprise-search-server-third-edition-raw
> > >
> > >>
> > >> This e-mail and all contents, including attachments, is considered to
> be
> > >> Company Confidential unless explicitly stated otherwise, regardless of
> > >> whether attachments are marked as such.
> >
> > _______________________
> > Eric Pugh | Founder & CEO | OpenSource Connections, LLC | 434.466.1467 |
> > http://www.opensourceconnections.com <
> > http://www.opensourceconnections.com/> | My Free/Busy <
> > http://tinyurl.com/eric-cal>
> > Co-Author: Apache Solr Enterprise Search Server, 3rd Ed <
> >
> https://www.packtpub.com/big-data-and-business-intelligence/apache-solr-enterprise-search-server-third-edition-raw
> >
> >
> > This e-mail and all contents, including attachments, is considered to be
> > Company Confidential unless explicitly stated otherwise, regardless of
> > whether attachments are marked as such.
> >
> >
>


-- 
http://www.needhamsoftware.com (work)
http://www.the111shift.com (play)

Reply via email to